top of page

šŸ“‰ Palantir Short šŸ“‰

  • Writer: MJ
    MJ
  • 17 hours ago
  • 4 min read

šŸ“ˆ Palantir has been one of the defining winners of the AI trade over the last two years. The company has executed exceptionally well, posting accelerating revenue growth, expanding margins, rising customer spend, and one of the strongest Rule of 40 profiles in software. From a business standpoint, there is very little to criticize.


āš–ļø From an investment standpoint, however, fundamentals are only half the equation. At current prices, Palantir’s valuation assumes both sustained hyper growth and near-flawless execution over many years, with very little margin for error.


šŸ“Š Palantir’s recent operating performance has been undeniably strong. In its latest reported quarter, revenue grew roughly 63% year over year, driven largely by its U.S. Commercial segment, which expanded more than 120% year over year to approximately $397 million. Total company revenue reached about $1.18 billion for the quarter, beating consensus estimates and marking one of the sharpest acceleration cycles in large-cap software. Net retention climbed to roughly 134%, deal activity expanded meaningfully across contract sizes, and adjusted operating margins pushed above 50%. On a Rule of 40 basis – combining growth and profitability – Palantir is posting a score north of 110%. This is an outlier even among best-in-class SaaS peers.


ā“ None of this is in dispute. The question is whether the stock price leaves room for this success to translate into attractive forward returns.


šŸ’° At current levels, Palantir trades at roughly 65–70x forward revenue and approximately 170–180x forward earnings, depending on the estimate set used. Even among premium cloud and security names – companies like CrowdStrike, Cloudflare, or Snowflake – valuation multiples are meaningfully lower, often in the 20–30x forward sales range. In other words, investors are paying more than double the revenue multiple for Palantir than for other category leaders, despite similar long-term growth ceilings and competitive risk.


šŸ“‰ Interestingly, Palantir’s trailing P/E ratio now sits north of 400x, placing it in a different universe from most large-cap software peers. Comparable high-growth AI and cloud companies generally trade in the 130x–210x trailing P/E range, already considered aggressive by historical standards. Even on a forward basis — where earnings expansion compresses multiples — Palantir remains more expensive than nearly all peers, despite the fact that consensus growth rates over the medium term are not radically higher.


🧠 What makes this particularly notable is that Palantir’s valuation premium is not merely incremental; it implies a fundamentally different earnings trajectory than the rest of the sector. The current multiple assumes that Palantir will not only sustain elevated revenue growth for many years, but also expand margins from already exceptional levels, avoid pricing compression as competition intensifies, and emerge as a structurally dominant platform in enterprise AI.


āš ļø That is a very high bar. History suggests that even elite software companies – including prior market darlings – tend to see valuation multiples compress as growth matures, competition increases, and revenue bases scale. In Palantir’s case, investors are effectively underwriting a multi-year continuation of near-perfect execution, with limited tolerance for any deceleration in growth, moderation in margins, or shift in sentiment toward AI valuations more broadly.


šŸ“‰ This creates an asymmetric setup. If Palantir continues to execute well, much of that upside already appears embedded in the stock price. If growth slows even modestly – or if the market begins to price Palantir more in line with other best-in-class SaaS companies – the downside from multiple compression could materially outweigh the remaining upside from fundamentals.


šŸŽÆ To justify this valuation, Palantir would need to sustain elevated revenue growth well above 40–50% for an extended period, continue expanding margins from already high levels, and avoid the competitive pricing pressure that tends to emerge as enterprise AI adoption matures. That is a very narrow path.


šŸ“Œ There are already early signs that growth, while strong, may normalize over time. Billings growth and remaining performance obligations have decelerated modestly relative to headline revenue acceleration, which can indicate that forward contract momentum is not expanding as quickly as reported revenue. Commercial growth outside the U.S. remains far slower than domestic expansion, and government revenue – while stable – does not offer the same runway as commercial enterprise software. These are not red flags on their own, but they matter when the market is pricing perfection.


🧩 We also think Palantir sits at the center of a broader dynamic we’ve been watching across AI equities: the market is increasingly rewarding ā€œAI narrative purityā€ more than long-term cash flow durability. In the same way that capital flooded into hyperscalers, semiconductor leaders, and AI infrastructure on optimistic assumptions, Palantir has become a symbolic proxy for enterprise AI success. That can drive short-term upside, but it also leaves the stock vulnerable if sentiment shifts or if growth expectations reset even modestly.


šŸ“£ Even Wall Street’s own positioning reflects this asymmetry. While some bullish analysts publish aggressive price targets, consensus upside from current levels is relatively limited, while bearish price targets imply substantial downside. That skew – modest expected upside versus large potential drawdown – reinforces our view that the risk-reward profile is unfavorable.


šŸ›‘ This is not a bet against Palantir’s technology, management team, or relevance in the AI ecosystem. It is, simply, a valuation-driven stance. Great businesses can still be poor investments if they are priced as if success is guaranteed.


šŸ“Ž Suffice it to say, in an environment where we are already cautious on richly valued AI and software names, Palantir stands out as one of the most stretched examples of multiple expansion outpacing fundamental reality. Our short position reflects the belief that the company can continue to execute operationally and still see its stock re-rate lower as growth normalizes and valuation discipline returns.


PS. If you want to copy my portfolio on eToro:

Ā 
Ā 
Ā 

Comments


bottom of page